Black world study- Intellectual Autobiography Essay

Dark world examination Intellectual Autobiography - Essay Example At the point when we find new implications in old things, it implies that our knowledge has created. Our scholarly advancement is being changed by a wide range of elements including individuals, conditions, perceptions and so forth. Some of them have more effect on us than others; still I accept that numerous things around change probably some little piece of us in each snapshot of our lives. Since it is really observation and information what continually make us all the more mentally created. The individual that molded my scholarly improvement presumably more than any other person in my life was my mom. She is never forlorn to me and after I accomplish something that harms me, as a matter of first importance, she asks me what ends have I previously made about the circumstance. This makes me hang on griping for a moment and acknowledge what botches I will never do any longer. In this way my mom has built up a solid capacity of basic thought of each approaching circumstance and data that transpires. Utilizing this capacity encourages me to learn quicker and don't stall out on very similar things experiencing difficulties continuing them. I accept that, as a result of my mom, presently I can work with my self-awareness utilizing basic reasoning and explanatory abilities, so I adapt without any problem. At the point when my companion exhorted me to peruse â€Å"The Shack† by William P. Youthful I was extremely incredulous about the book since I couldn't help suspecting that Christian books like this are intended to connect with me and show me a not too bad living. However, the companion guaranteed me that the book was a â€Å"life-changer† and I expected to peruse it at all. He was directly about the book. Before I read it I hadn’t understood that books really can trigger so much feelings, emotions, and acknowledgment about the life. The content transformed me as an individual and certainly raised my insight. The fact of the matter is that the book doesn’t just show you a totally another perspective on and what is terrible and what is acceptable in this life yet in addition expands your

Barn Burning And Aandp Rite Of Passage

Journeies By Young Men Essay, Research Paper Soul changing experience: Journeies by Young Men The glorification of the state rests in the character of her work powers. Furthermore, character originates from childhood. Hence every male youngster is a test to his seniors. Herbert Hoover Acquiring custom of progress can take topographic point wherever from youth upward into the mid-twentiess or even mid-thirtiess, yet is most typically under-taken in the late pre-adult mature ages. In the short stories An A ; P by John Updike, and Barn Burning by William Faulkner, the components of unyielding cultural frameworks, adult guidelines and approval outlines how a couple of juvenile work powers make their evaluation on society by going contrary to what would be expected so as to pick up their custom of progress. Updike s account takes topographic point in a food advertise shop situated in the focal point of an extremely traditionalist New England people group. Much like the little town, the An A ; P food advertise shop watches resolute cultural frameworks, for example, legitimate shopping manners and suitable gown codification. The ordinary customers, houseslaves and sheep as alluded to by Sammy, shy away from the audaciousness of the juvenile misss whole disregard for appropriate gown codification and typical traffic stream of the passageways. Sammy, on the different manus, is enchanted by the youthful misss and sees nil mistaken with their attire, despite the fact that he comprehends their pick of vesture is non suitable orchestrating to shop arrangement. Moreover, Sammy is delighted and engaged by the misss jokes of resiling around the shop like pinballs. At last, Sammy s expansive perspective on the situation prompts his assurance to help the two his and the misss convictions by emblematically throwing his mandatory attire of petticoat and necktie. Sammy understands that he feels so firmly about the situation that he forfeits his occupation so as to turn out his point and back up his convictions. In making so he requests grown-up guidelines and approval by facing Lengal and saying, I quit, and You didn Ts need to abash them. Lengal, as a more seasoned strong resident and figure of approval, addresses Sammy on his blunder after he counters, It was they who were abashing us. Lengal so thinks that its reasonable to influence other approval figures in Sammy s life by saying, Sammy, you wear t privation to make this to your Mom and Dad with an additional kicker of You ll experience this for a mind-blowing rest. Sammy realizes that the two proclamations from Lengal are genuine ; by the by he feels it important to move out what he has begun. Now Sammy only diverts off from Lengal and walks outside. Faulkner s account takes topographic point in mid twentieth century profound South. The Snopes are compelled to make a trip perpetually due to Abner s refusal to work together with society. In outcome, Abner has secluded his family unit and upholds their dutiful after by appointing thorough subject and anticipates that them should ship out his every need and request. At the main characteristic of incompliance Abner is fast to grant a firm manus of correction to the blaming family unit part. Lamentably, the solitary family part that falls into this class is the 10 twelvemonth old Sarty. Sarty desperately needs to amuse his male parent ; by and by he ends up in a scrape between slam ing what he accepts is ethically right and his detected obligation to be faithful to his male parent. In the test against his male parent for the consumed horse shelter, Sarty is confronted with taking certainty to his male parent or expressing reality as he accepts. Sarty s thoughts during the test are mirrored our foe he thought in that franticness ; ourn! Mine and hisn both! He s my male parent! [ sic ] Abner has clearly arranged his kid before the test. Sarty is battling to change over himself that his male parent s side is correct. In any case, now, he chooses to agree with his male parent despite the fact that he sees an inappropriate in making so. He focuses on me to lie. [ a ] neodymium I will hold to make hit. [ sic ] Sarty would t be able to go against his male parent and face the obvious fury that will follow. After the test and half way through another move, Abner sits down to chat with his kid and areas You were fixing to state them. You would hold let him know. Your pro curing to be a grown-up male. You got the opportunity to larn. You got the opportunity to larn to hotel to your ain blood or you ain t going to hold any blood to cabin to you. As the story advances, Abner is going to transport on one more animal dwellingplace consuming occurrence. He is fixing to go forward his home and requests his wedded lady to keep onto Sarty. Abner is frightful that Sarty will tail him and caution the owners. Sarty, frantic to stop his male parent, passes on his sentiments Ain T you venturing out to try and direct a nigga? He cried. In any event you sent a nigga previously! Abner thinks about restricting him up yet settees for his wedded lady keeping on to him. At long last, Sarty interferences liberated from his female guardians handle and flurries to caution the new casualties. Sarty has in the long run chosen to support what he accepts to be correct and just. After he tells DeSpain he rushes from the house and keeps running off from the scene. He hears a shooting followed by two more ; he quits running long bounty to yell Pap! Pap! He continues running, accidentally, and chooses to run as distant as he can while he wails Father! Fa ther! In the two accounts the juvenile work powers perceive the specific point where they have inevitably made a qualms assurance to remain by their ain convictions and moral intentions, in this way acquiring their single topographic point in the public eye regardless. With Sammy go forthing the An A ; P and thinking back in, he sees Lengal in his old topographic point look intoing through the sheep. His stomach falls as he envisions how troublesome the universe will be to him hereinafter. In like manner, Sarty inevitably tires from running and sits to think about what had just taken topographic point and understands the size of his activities and realizes he can neer return. Sarty ponders the troublesome life in the great beyond in front yet would t be able to help feeling soothed for interfering with the ironss of servitude that were emplaced on him by his male parent. The fragile move from youth to masculinity is attempted and found in all human advancements and different backgrounds. A few entries are of more noteworthy greatness than others. Be that as it may, all transmutations come from a qualms assurance to do a base on what is accepted to be of import and right. In the two outlines the juvenile work powers have defied the unbendable cultural frameworks that encompassed them in this way picking up their ritual of change into masculinity. The solitary czar I acknowledge in this universe is the still voice inside. Mahatma Gandhi

Childs personality and life Essay Example for Free

Childs character and life Essay Andy Murray is one of the more outgoing person tennis players on the tennis court and is known for his regular upheavals of energy and his forceful style of play. In December 2004 he was named the Young Sports Personality of the Year which bolsters my hypothesis that he is an extravert. Additionally Andy Murray doesn't bashful from the media he regularly discusses his game, mentors and even relatives, for example, After a match against Stepanek, he addressed the media saying; I was truly content with the manner in which I played and you could see that by the festivals and my mum creation a simpleton of herself An increasingly withdrawn individual would normally simply discuss there execution and there own response. Tim Henman Tim Henman is one of the more self observer tennis players on the field he is very moderate and calm. His festival (the exchange mark clench hand grip) bolsters that he is moderate however he may have an upheaval of energy it for the most part is quirt and short. Tim Henman gets a great deal of media consideration since he is Englands number one, however he can deal with the media spotlight know when his profession originally began he didn't care for all the media consideration and attempted to keep away from it. That indicated a timid withdrawn trademark. An increasingly outgoing individual would of preferred being main focus and anticipated gathering with the media. Rugby Union The two rugby association players I have decided to explore are Martin Johnson and Johnny Wilkinson. Martin Johnson Martin Johnson is one of the notable and achieved skippers ever. He captained England to the 2003 Six Nations Grand Slam and drove club side Leicester Tigers as they won four back to back Zurich Premiership titles and an European Cup twofold. He has additionally visited with the Lions multiple times. He turned into the main man in history to commander them twice when he drove the Lions on the voyage through Australia in 2001, in the wake of driving the triumphant voyage through South Africa in 1997. On the pitch he is a player who motivates the best out of his players by showing others how its done and yelling consolation and guidelines which shows extravert characteristics. Off the pitch when Martin Johnson converses with the media he doesn't care for discussing himself which is strange for an extravert however when conversing with the media he generally centers around the aggregate which shows he is a major group man. In the meeting after the triumphant world cup last he stated: It was a tremendous exertion by the whole crew of players, mentors and private alcove staff, everyone. On account of the fans they were mind boggling he additionally said I cannot say enough regarding the group What he said to the media fortifies that he is a major group man. This additionally shows an extravert trait of getting a charge out of doing exercises that include others Johnny Wilkinson Johnny Wilkinson is a contemplative rugby player yet the drop objective during additional time that won England the World Cup in 2003 made him the most acclaimed players in global expert rugby. On the field he has gained notoriety for precise kicking and furious handling; off the field he has gained notoriety for rehearsing unendingly and maintaining a strategic distance from exposure. This shows two independent attributes one of doing things alone (preparing) two dodging media consideration (exposure) being timid. Is it true that we are brought into the world with our characters? The appropriate response is well there isnt one there is just speculations climate we are brought into the world with a character. I accept we might be brought into the world with a character issue (mental confusion) however they are the ones that have been deductively demonstrated. I accept our character relies upon natural variables (schools physiology and so forth) and massively how our folks cooperate with us and others. Youngsters gain from duplicating others and they duplicate there guardians more than anyone. Guardians are divine beings according to their youngsters I believe that expression summarizes how much a parent influences a Childs character and life.

Research and Discuss Justification Of Using Terror Tactics - 550 Words

Research and Discuss Justification Of Using Terror Tactics (Term Paper Sample) Content: THE QUEST FOR NATIONAL FREEDOM OR NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE AND THE USE OF TERRORIST TACTICSIntroductionTerrorism and terror tactics denotes the unlawful use or threat of violence especially against the state or the public as a politically motivated means of attack or coercion. The main rationale that drives of terrorists to use violent tactics is largely in an effort to create political change, threaten or induce fear in the public and/or government, raise media attention and/or further their political cause CITATION Bre08 \l 1033 (Bree, 2008).The quest for national freedom as well as national independence has been recorded in various historical accounts from across the world, the North America, Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa as various peoples sought to relieve themselves of the yoke of colonialism and occupation that brought about domination, humiliation, subjugation among other kinds of ations as Malcom X would refer to them in his famous By Any Means Necess ary speech.In order to realize this dream or aspiration of national freedom and national independence, these people have been forced to resort to a number of means that are aimed at realizing this desired end. Among the methods that have been employed include non-violence methods such as the Satyagraha method employed in the 1930s and 1940s as India, led by Mohandas Mahatma Gandhi, sought to relieve herself of the colonial yoke of British rule.During the American civil rights movement, this method was also employed as blacks who had long been inhumanely treated with discrimination, segregation, lynching and being denied rights sought to fight for their freedom using boycotts, sit-ins, bus rides, demonstrations, court cases among other methods.However, it is important to note that others have used to terrorist tactics in order to acquire national freedom and national independence. These methods have divided opinion both in and outside academic circles as some see the means as justifi ed as long as they seek to achieve the desired noble ends. Others have seen the ends as important just like the means and thus attack these terror tactics as unjustified. To this end therefore, it is nearly impossible to draw a consensus amongst scholars. Against this backdrop, this paper seeks to examine one of the questions that has dogged the academy for eons as posed by scholars such as Gus Martin, i.e., whether the quest for national freedom or national independence justifies the use of terrorist tactics CITATION Mar10 \l 1033 (Martin, 2010). The paper argues that the usage of terror is justifiable but under certain conditions.WHEN THE QUEST FOR NATIONAL FREEDOM OR INDEPENDENCE JUSTIFIES THE USE OF TERRORIST TACTICSThere are a number of grounds that justify the usage of terror as a tactic in the quest for national freedom and/or national independence. First, terror may be justified where the definition of terrorism is a political one which doesnt differentiate between revoluti onary violence and terrorism. According to Melayna Lamb, the concept of terrorism and its connotation and denotation has been subject to political distortion to suit the power arithmetic of the day. While the quest fro freedom or independence will not necessarily lead to the use of terrorism, empirically speaking, most freedom and independence movements at some point have engaged in some kind of terroristic activity. However, in one instance, when it suits the world overlords or interests of the West, it is normally referred to as freedom movement and whole it is against the interests of the West, it is referred to as terrorism CITATION Lam10 \l 1033 (Lamb, 2010).A good example is the Mau Mau movement in Kenya which was labeled terrorist despite the fact that it was using terrorist attacks to marginal levels as compared to the terrorism being used by the then colonial government against Mau Mau and against the Kikuyus who were perceived as the main antagonists CITATION Elk05 \l 103 3 \m And11 (Elkins, 2005; Anderson, 2011). Another example is during the Cold War whereby there was widespread Western support and engagement with terrorism, as it was seen to serve a political purpose. The over-riding fear of the spread of communism was seen to legitimize the use of terrorism in pursuit of capitalism, democracy and freedom. Of course the Western policy-makers would never describe their tactics as constituting a form of terrorism CITATION Lam10 \l 1033 (Lamb, 2010).In Europe, the Nazi occupiers characterized the work of the resistance movements such as the French, Czech, and Polish as terrorism. For the resistance movements, they were not terrorists but freedom fighters and their clandestine work of sabotage and ambush-destroying bridges and railroads and assassinating German officials as well as their local collaborators-was a wholly justifiable tactic of a war of national liberation. This same justification was used by a series of anti-colonial movements across the world as the wave of independence swept across the world. The Viet Minh were against French rule in Vietnam and they used wartime tactics of resistance to attack the French with the classic weapons of terrorism, raiding remote plantations to kill French overseers, random shootings and bombs in crowded cafes, all designed to destroy the morale of the French civilians. These tactics were also used against the British in Palestine by Israeli freedom fighters where they blew up civilians in hotels, assassinated British troops, and ambushed British patrols, all in the name of the national liberation of Israel CITATION Wal01 \l 1033 (Walker, 2001).Another justification for the use of terrorism in the quest for national independence and national freedom is that it leads to a noble end which will lead to the betterment of many. Under this argument, it leads to the highest pleasure to the highest number of people thus is justifiable under the utilitarian thinking of Jeremy Bentham CITAT ION Mil03 \l 1033 (Mill, Bentham, Troyer, 2003). Under such conditions, terrorism is justified. This is because in the face of an enemy who is insurmountable through conventional means, the resort to terrorism which assures freedom and independence since the realization of the same ably shows that the ends did justify the means CITATION Lam10 \l 1033 (Lamb, 2010).Another justification for terrorism is that it is justifiable from a contractarian viewpoint in that only through embracing terrorism in a given where a people are fighting for their national independence and national freedom. According to Hobbes, fear is a characteristic of a people living in a state of nature which must be shed if they are to live in a community of civilization. Since a people who live under domination are subjected to fear such in the case of the colonial state, they must expunge this continual fear CITATION Hob11 \l 1033 (Hobbes, 2011).Continual fear, Hobbes further postulates, is the unrelenting fe ar of imminent violent death, like the one that characterized colonial Kenya especially in Central Kenya CITATION Elk05 \l 1033 \m And11 (Elkins, 2005; Anderson, 2011), is unspeakably awful. It is, Hobbes opines, worse than ignorance. A life of continual fear is scarcely a life at all. Someone who is in the grip of chronic terror is in a state of constant distress as he has his heart all the day gnawed on by fear of death, poverty, or other calamity and has no repose, nor pause of his anxiety, but in sleep. This condition must be expunged by all means where possible and if terrorism is the means, then so be it CITATION Hob11 \l 1033 (Hobbes, 2011).Critics of terrorist tactics in liberation movements striving to achieve national independence and national freedom often point out, borrowing from Max Webers philosophy, that the state has a monopoly on violence, which therefore legitimates the use of it, and that any other group using violence is illegitimate. However, those who suppo rt the use of terrorism by resistance movements counter-argue that if this were true, then, Nelson Mandela should have been universally condemned as nothing more than a terrorist and murderer, something the Thatcher government, a critical ally of the apartheid regimes of South Africa, liked to call him. This is not a serious position to hold, Brian Brivati argues, since alternatively, we might say that the violence employed by all states, at least if they are Western democracies, is illegitimate CITATION Bri09 \l 1033 (Brivati, 2009).Brivati further argues that the many cases of the necessity of war, September 1939 where Nazi Germany invaded Poland, for example, invalidate this position. To this end, he argues, violence is an ethically acceptable extension of the struggle. While we may not reach an objective basis for the support of the armed struggle in one context as against another, Brivati argues, we can at least suggest principles that are reasonable and then defend those prin ciples. He finds fault in the forced position to accept that the use of violence against soft targets is terrorism in whatever cause it is employed arguing that there is a difference in that we might support some causes and not others because we see them as morally virtuous or vicious CITATION Bri09 \l 1033 (Brivati, 2009).To this end therefore, Brivati argues that the use of violence, whether by states or other groups, should be based on the same argument as that used to justify a declaration of war, the just war theory. He dichotomizes his distinction as one not based on the difference between freedom fighter and terrorist but between murderer and terrorist whereby the former simply kills nihilistically because they are killing in a cause that the common do not believe in, and the latter using violence as part of an achievable and just political project with which the common agree CITATION Bri09 \l 10...

Sustainable Competitive Advantage Based On Product Alone Free Essay Example, 4750 words

Most companies find it impossible to create any kind of sustainable competitive advantage based on product alone as successful companies sought and found a precise understanding of how it could create a customer-centred competitive advantage. Along with the changing business world, customers change as well, becoming more demanding and knowledgeable than before. In this light, reliance on the internal resources of the organization will not do if environmental considerations of the company are not likewise taken into account. These include the significant market characteristics that directly and indirectly influence and dictate the strategic business implementation and sound decision-making from the options available. The forecast of subsequent political, economic, and social implications that change will result to also needs to be identified and enumerated to ensure the success and development of the organization as well as the welfare of the general public. The best suppliers contin uously update and upgrade their service deliveries in order to answer the demands of their customers. Customers have the ever-increasing demand on getting their hands into the products which can lead to change in supplier if expectations are not met. We will write a custom essay sample on Sustainable Competitive Advantage Based On Product Alone or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/page

The American Revolution A Significant Part Of American...

The American Revolution is a very significant part of American History. It is more than just a course for credit. After all, it is the reason behind the birth of this great nation. The American Revolution took place between 1765 and 1783 during which the colonists in the thirteen American colonies rejected the British monarchy and aristocracy, overthrew the authority of Great Britain and founded the the United States of America. By 1763 the crisis had begun to develop. John Adams was right when he wrote; â€Å"The revolution was in the minds of the people, and the union of of the colonies, before hostilities commenced. The revolution and union were gradually forming from the years 1760 to 1776.† The minds of the people were storehouses not only of a list of grievances but of democratic sentiments and ideas stored during the many years of resistance to royal and clerical absolutism. Following the signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1763 ending the French and Indian war, there was an immediate uprising of American Indian tribes living in the Great Lakes regions.George Grenville, named Primed Minister in 1763, he discovered in the colonies shockingly dishonest practces; smuggling in defiance of the acts of navagation; disregard of British low in general; and inefficient, wasteful custom collection. He returned to England determined to remedy these conditions. The British Monarchy decided to address the pro blem. They decided to develop legislations that sought to subdue theShow MoreRelatedThe American Revolution Was A Significant Part Of American History1524 Words   |  7 PagesThe American Revolution was a significant part of American History. It marked the first time in history that people fought for their independence. Even though there were not as many deaths in this war compared to the wars that would come in later years, it was still a great part of history and not only for America, but other countries as well. With the absence of the American Revolution, the United States would not be where it is today. Military strategies that were developed in key battles throughoutRead MoreWhat Factors During The Colonial Period Essay1636 Words   |  7 Pagescolonial period led to American colonists declaring independence from the British Empire? Be sure to discuss the economic, political, and cultural aspects of the American Revolution. PROVISIONAL HYPOTHESIS: The structure of America revolution to address a various issue, which has great impact on America It, was the procedure where the thirteen colonies of North America became independent of Great Britain also then formed a new integrated government. The major reasons of America revolution are cultural, economicRead More Gordon Wood’s Radicalism of the American Revolution Essay1493 Words   |  6 PagesGordon Wood’s Radicalism of the American Revolution is a book that extensively covers the origin and ideas preceding the American Revolution. Wood’s account of the Revolution goes beyond the history and timeline of the war and offers a new encompassing look inside the social ideology and economic forces of the war. Wood explains in his book that America went through a two-stage progression to break away from the Monarchical rule of the English. He believes the pioneering revolutionaries were rootedRead MoreComparing the French Revolution and the American Revolution Essay example857 Words   |  4 Pages The French and American revolutions are both very significant in the world’s history. The American Revolution happened first, around the last half of the 18th century where the Thirteen Colonies became the United States of America, and gained independence from the British Empire. The French revolution on the other hand, was from 1789 until the turn of the century 1799. For the French people this was a period of political and social turmoil. The idea of Enlightenment stuck a large populationRead MoreThe American Colonies Military Struggles with European Nations687 Words   |  3 PagesFrench and Indian War, the American Revolution, and the War of 1812 are all significant links in the chronological chain of history that has led us to the creation of the United States of America. If any of these linked events were not to have occurred or had a different outcome, the United States very well would not exist or would still be a group of European colonies. Lasting from 1756 until 1763, The French and Indian War was mainly a proxy war fought between the American Colonies acting as proxiesRead MoreThe American Revolution : A Historiographical Introduction846 Words   |  4 PagesThe American Revolution, also known as the U.S. War of Independence, started in the early 1700s and ended in the late 1700s. This war was started in an attempt to end the tension between the American colonies and the British government. After reading the article, â€Å"The American Revolution: A Historiographical Introduction,† provided by The British Library, and â€Å"The Historiography of the American Revolution† by Michael Hattem, I have a better overall understanding of how the history of the AmericanRead MoreAnalysis Of Harriet Beecher Stowe s Account Of Black Soldiers 1580 Words   |  7 PagesThe telling of history of Blacks who fought in the Revolutionary War started in 1850 with author William Nells’ account of Black Soldiers. Ha rriet Beecher Stowe contended in her overview to Nell’s Colored Patriots of the American Revolution, the work gave way to the possible to â€Å"‘give new self-respect and confidence to the race†¦And their white brothers in reading may remember, that generosity, disinterested courage and bravery, are of no particular race and complexion, and that the image of the HeavenlyRead MoreThe Historical Narrative Of The Years And Events Surrounding1461 Words   |  6 Pagessurrounding the American Revolution has increasingly become simplified. What was once characterized in the 19th century as a complex historiography of betrayal and loyalty, friends and enemies, and a non-violent civil war within a revolution, evolved into a 21st century brief summation of a few key people, taxes, and battles. John Adams accurately forewarned his trusted confidante and fellow patriot, Dr. Benjamin Rush, in 1790 when he wrote that the history of the American Revolution â€Å"will be one continuedRead MoreDbq - American Revolu tion950 Words   |  4 PagesOne of the most significant events in the history of America was the American Revolution. It was not so significant because of the number of deaths or the affects it had on Americas relationship with Great Britain, but more because of the changes it caused in society socially, economically, and politically. American society was greatly affected socially by the American Revolution. Compared to women in Europe, women in America already held a slightly greater role in society. That role would growRead MoreAn Unsung Hero in the Story of Americas Independence1133 Words   |  5 Pagesand one of the most significant supporters of the American war for independence. Thomas Paine is most notably recognized for his pamphlet, Common Sense, which he wrote during the early stages of the American Revolution as a call to the colonists to join together and support the fight for independence. Unfortunately, besides this pamphlet, Paine is often unknown, forgotten, and not someone who comes to mind immediately when one thinks of the original founding fathers of American Democracy. When Thomas

Textbook Civil Liberties And Human Rights â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Textbook Civil Liberties And Human Rights? Answer: Introducation The law of torts constitutes a wrongful action which has been committed against an individual (which may include an artificial legal person) instead of a state. The fundamental principle of the law of tort is that every citizen has certain liberties, rights and interest which have to be provided protection through the legal principles. In case of tort law the interest is given protection through the concept of damages provided by the courts against any infringement of the civil rights in relation to an individual. In addition through the issue of an injunction (an order by the court to refrain a person from indulging a particular act) the court prevents the person from committing an act. The law of tort is a very bread ranging subject and one of the most complex in relation to all legal spheres in relation to laying down all of its embracing principles. As provided by Abraham and Kenneth (2017) a tort may be defined as a civil wrong which makes an aggrieved party to be entitled to co mpensation in from of damages[1]. However the paper provides an argument that the law of tort is much about civil liberties as it is often misunderstood. The purpose of the paper is to discuss the objectives of tort law as it applies to the legal world along with make the audiences know that the law is mostly intends to provide civil liberties to the citizens. In order to discuss about the objectives of tort law the various areas in which the provisions of the law apply have to be analyzed. The law of tort is divided into various areas such as Negligence, Nuisance and defamation. As defined by Christopher (2017) the tort of negligence is a set of legal principles which are imposed so that a wrongdoer can be punished for his action[2]. As provided by Frank (2016) negligence is the area of law which has been enacted to ensure that a person whose rights have been violated is duly compensated by the wrongdoer in relation to the loss caused by him because of the wrongdoer[3]. However a closer analysis of tort of negligence in the light of the theory of deterrence as provided by Lee, David and McCrary (2017), which evidently provide the result that the law of negligence has been enacted so that the person may be careful towards his action which might foreseeably cause injury to another[4]. The assertion can be further strengthened and supported through the analysis of the elements which are required to establish a claim of negligence. The first element which is necessary to establish the tort off negligence is the duty of care. As provided by one of the most talked about case Donoghue v Stevenson[5] a person owes another a duty to care for, even if there is no legal relationship between them which would create an obligation, if a person can foresee that his action can harm the other as a reasonable person would have done. According to Richard (2016) civil liberties are the position of being imposed with laws which have been brought into existence for the common good of the community, with special reference to the freedom of speech and action[6]. Murray, Nancy, and Wunsch (2016) defines civil liberties as the right of a person to be imposed with legal obligations which are established only for the good of the community[7]. As highlighted by Neil (2016) civil liberties can have a very broad definition which may vary from society to society by the basic principles of civil liberty is that law should ensure that a person is able to exercise properly his right to actions and speech. [8]The concept of the duty of care therefore itself establishes civil liberties not only to the aggrieved party but also to any potential wrongdoer. A person is not prevented according to the duty of care to exercises his civil liberties but is only directed to continue his actions in such a way which would not harm another per son. In the same way civil liberties are provided to a person to safely carry on his activities with the assumption that other would not carry out an act which may harm him. The second essential in relation to the tort of negligence arises when the duty of care is violated. In the famous case Vaughan v Menlove[9] the court provided one of the most commonly used test for the purpose of identifying whether a existing duty to care for has not been complied with, known as the objective test. The principles of the famous test imply that a reasonable person (Hypothetical) has to be placed in the same situation where the alleged wrongdoer was while the said negligence was committed and then see whether the reasonable person would have taken a more cautious approach towards the incident to avoid the harm caused. As provided by Amanda (2015) a duty of care and the harm being caused cannot establish negligence unless it is provided that the wrongdoer acted in an unreasonable manner[10]. Therefore it can be provided that the concept does not prohibit any civil liberty but only ask a person to act in a way which is reasonable and acceptable to the society. However a s per the provisions of the Civil Liability Act of the different states in Australia a duty is breach on not is analyzed in the light of the significance of the harm. This provision may to a little extent can be used by the critics to say that the law of tort imposes obligation to be extra cautious and thus restrict civil liberties. However if the provisions are interpreted in the light of the social utility provision of the Act it can be stated clearly that a person needs to be extra cautious in relation to only those activities which are of high utility to the society. In addition the actions of a professional as provided through the case of Boyd v. Ackley[11] are compared to a reasonable professional and not a normal person. This is because it is common sense to believe that a professional would have more knowledge as compared to a reasonable person and thus is expected to work in an increased proficient manner. Moreover the defenses which have been provided through the tort of n egligence such as Contributory negligence, intoxication and failing to take precautions against obvious risks also help a defendant to be aware that merely because they have been a little negligent they cannot be held accountable for the all the loss which have been suffered by the plaintiff which may because of his own actions. Thus it can be stated evidently that provisions which are used to analyze the breach of duty of care also do not intervene with any civil liberties of a person. Damages which are provided in the case of negligence are only to compensate the loss which has been suffered by a party and not to punish a person for being negligent as it is done in other for m of law such as corporation law and criminal law trough penalties. Defamation is another area of tort law which deals with the right to speech of a person. It is often misunderstood to have imposed unwanted restriction on the liberty to speak. As defined by Richard et al. (2015) is a catch all term in relation to any statement which hurts the reputation of another person[12]. The concept is based on the fact that each person in the society has the right to maintain his reputation rather than imposing a restriction on another person to talk in relation to others. The tort of defamation purport to protect the reputation of an individual in the society from any wrongful act depicted to a group or a community as whole by another person[13]. It does not prevent a person to carry out his speech in relation to another personally. Defamation can take place in two forms one is written defamation known as Libel and the other is spoken defamation which is known as slander[14]. The tort of defamation in order to provide civil liberties to the citizens contains significant defense which ensure that the right to speech of a person is not restricted and in addition the right is not used to cause harm to another person. The law of defamation in Australia is largely based on the English law of defamation. However there are certain limitations which have been added through statues along with the commonwealth constitution which limits the power of the government in relation to political speeches as established through the famous case of Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation[15] This step by the legislature clearly indicates that the intention of the law of torts as often misunderstood is to provide civil liberties. Even the government itself is not allowed to use the law to the detriment of other. The defenses in relation to defamation provide that defamations cannot be established if the statement made is true, in good faith with reasonable belief to be true, an opinion, mere vulgar abuse, comment for public interest and innocent dissemin ation. however in order to ensure that the defenses which have been provided in relation to defamation are misused in order to cause harm to another person the law has clearly stated to apply the principles of civil liberties that the defenses are not applicable if an element of malice is found in the actions of the defendant. Nuisance is also a common law tort which deals with annoyance, offence, injury or trouble in relation to a property of a person[16]. A nuisance can be both private and public. As provided by Neyers (2017) nuisance is an unwanted act or omission in relation to discharging a legal duty which may cause inconvenience to others towards exercising rights which are common to all[17]. Traditionally the term nuisance is used in three ways. Firstly to describe a condition or activity that is annoying or harmful to others such as a rubbish heap, an indecent conduct or a smoking chimney. Secondly to describe the injury which result out of the conditions as discussed. Thirdly to provide and describe a legal liability which arises from the above discussion. However the actions in nuisance can only arise out of activities which take place in the property of the wrongdoer. Again in the same way as compared to that of defamation and negligence, nuisance also operates to promote civil liberties as opp osed to restricting the right of an individual. [18]At common law and equity every person has the right to enjoy their property in a peaceful manner, nuisance ensures that such right is provided to the individuals in accordance to civil liberties by restricting the right of others only to such extent which is necessary to prevent injury or harm to others. Civil liberties are one of the fundamental needs of the modern day society. They are a kind of personal freedom which should not be curtailed under any circumstances by the legislature. However civil liberties must not be taken as a right which allows for causing harm to another. From the above discussed analysis it can be evidently stated that the primary objective to tort law is very much about civil liberties. This is because all the major areas of tort law aim to protect the rights of citizens rather than focusing on imposing restrictions. The elements for such areas have been framed in such a manner which ensures that not only the rights of individuals are protected but also no additional restrictions are imposed on other individuals in relation to such rights. The law of torts thus mostly purports to provide and protect right rather than taking them away or restricting them. References Abraham, Kenneth. The forms and functions of tort law. West Academic, 2017. Barendt, Eric. "Defamation Law." (2017): 1-5. Cavico, Frank J., et al. "The Tort of Negligence in Employment Hiring, Supervision, and Retention." American Journal of Business and Society 1.4 (2016): 205-222. Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 AC 522 Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) HCA 25. Lee, David S., and Justin McCrary. "The deterrence effect of prison: Dynamic theory and evidence." Regression Discontinuity Designs: Theory and Applications. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2017. 73-146. Lyons, Amanda. "Duty of care." Good Practice 12 (2015): 24. MacCallum, Walter. "Defamation actions and social media: Where are the risks?." Governance Directions 67.11 (2015): 677. Murray, Nancy, and Sarah Wunsch. "Civil Liberties in Times of Crisis: Lessons from History." Massachusetts Law Review 2015 (2016): 2014. Neyers, J. W., and Andrew Botterell. "Tate Lyle: Pure Economic Loss and the Modern Tort of Public Nuisance." Alta. L. Rev. 53 (2015): 1031.Neyers, J. W. "RECONCEPTUALISING THE TORT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE." The Cambridge Law Journal 76.1 (2017): 87-115. Parkes, Richard, et al. Gatley on libel and slander. Sweet Maxwell, 2015. Richards, Neil. Intellectual privacy: Rethinking civil liberties in the digital age. Oxford University Press, USA, 2015. Robinette, Christopher, et al. "JOuRNal Of TORT law." (2017). Stone, Richard. Textbook on civil liberties and human rights. Oxford University Press, USA, 2014. Swisher, Peter N. "Virginia Practice Series: Tort and Personal Injury Law." (2015). Vaughan v Menlove (1837) 3 Bing. N.C. 467